Which survivorship rules are relevant when calculating the best record in master data consolidation?

In the context of SAP Master Data Governance, survivorship rules are critical when determining the best record during the master data consolidation process. These rules help to manage the selection and prioritization of data from multiple records, ensuring that the most accurate and complete information is retained.

The relevance of both table level rules and field level rules stems from the necessity to evaluate data at different granularities. Table level rules allow for a broader comparison across entire records, taking into account the context and relationship of fields at a higher level. This ensures that the best record is not just determined by isolated data points but considers the overall integrity of the data.

Field level rules, on the other hand, focus on individual attributes within the records. They help to assess which specific values for each field are more reliable or complete, contributing to the final decision on which record should be selected as the best.

By combining both table level and field level rules, the consolidation process can achieve a more nuanced and thorough evaluation of the data, leading to better decision-making regarding which master data record to retain as the authoritative source. This dual approach ensures that both the specifics of data attributes and the context of entire records are taken into consideration, providing a comprehensive overview necessary for effective data governance.