Which of the following represents a process step detail that can be tracked in the audit trail?

The detail that can be tracked in the audit trail is the record of when process parameters were changed. This aspect is crucial for maintaining data integrity and compliance within SAP Master Data Governance.

Audit trails serve as a historical record of changes made, allowing organizations to monitor important modifications within their data governance processes. The ability to see when process parameters were altered ensures transparency and accountability, which are essential for troubleshooting issues and verifying compliance with regulatory standards. Such records can help in understanding the timing and context of data changes, enabling administrators and managers to make informed decisions about data governance practices.

The other options, while they may pertain to aspects of the system or user interactions, do not directly relate to specific change tracking in an audit trail. For instance, the name of the system administrator involved is related to the responsibility but may not be a standard part of the audit trail detail. Overall performance metrics are valuable for assessing the system's efficiency but do not offer insights into specific data changes. Individual user satisfaction ratings provide feedback on user experience but are not typically included in auditing practices surrounding data changes.