How should organizations manage data ownership disputes in MDG?

Managing data ownership disputes in SAP Master Data Governance (MDG) involves establishing processes and structures that can effectively address and resolve conflicts. The choice to implement clear governance policies and defined workflows is essential for several reasons.

First, governance policies provide a framework that outlines roles, responsibilities, and expectations regarding data ownership. By having these policies in place, organizations can create clarity around who owns specific data sets and how disputes should be handled when they arise. This structured approach helps to prevent misunderstandings and ensures all parties are aware of the established protocols.

Second, defined workflows streamline the process of managing disputes. When a disagreement over data ownership occurs, having a systematic workflow allows for a transparent and efficient resolution process. This might involve steps for reporting disputes, reviewing evidence, and reaching a resolution through established channels, thus promoting accountability and reducing the potential for escalation.

Additionally, clear governance policies and workflows encourage active communication among data stewards, management, and other stakeholders, fostering a collaborative environment where issues are addressed proactively. This approach aligns with best practices in governance, as it prioritizes systematic dispute resolution over arbitrary decisions or penalties, which may not address the underlying issues effectively.

By focusing on governance and structured workflows, organizations can create a lasting foundation for data integrity and ownership,